What is Science-based Fitness and Nutrition?

Charlotte Lake • April 16, 2025

What makes information "science-based"?

Information about fitness and nutrition is ubiquitous in our modern age. However, a good deal of that information is better characterized as misinformation. There is so much of it that it is difficult to know which information is accurate, or helpful, and which is inaccurate, counterproductive, or even harmful. Fortunately, there is science-based information available, but it is not always accessible.


First, allow me to explain what I mean when I refer to information as “science-based.” What does it mean for information to be science-based? For information to be considered science-based, it must originate from, is supported by, or is consistent with the findings and principles derived from scientific research. It is based on evidence (observable, testable, and measurable) arrived at through systematic observation and experimentation and
is not based merely on intuition, opinion, belief, tradition, or personal anecdotes. 


Ideally, this information is peer-reviewed. In formal scientific practice, findings are typically subjected to peer review before publication. This means that other independent experts critically examine the methodology, data analysis, and conclusions of the research under consideration to determine whether it meets rigorous standards. The methods and findings of this research should ideally be reproducible, meaning other researchers could replicate the research and make similar findings in an attempt to eliminate bias.


One thing that many non-scientists fail to appreciate is the value of scientific consensus. Often, “science-based” refers to conclusions supported by a large body of evidence from multiple studies, potentially leading to a scientific consensus within a relevant field which is typically stronger than information based on a single, isolated study especially if that study contradicts said consensus. 


This is especially important in the fields of exercise and nutrition science because studies in these fields are often “under powered,” or low in the probability that a study will correctly detect an effect, due to practical issues in the field such as funding, low sample sizes, small effect sizes, data variability, and so on. This is why researchers in these fields rely so much on meta-analyses and/or systematic literature reviews, because they can pool data sets from many studies to mitigate the limitations of under-powered individual studies.


Going back to the concept of a scientific consensus, we should value a more holistic picture of research because it is an indicator of high confidence and reliability, it serves as a foundation for further progress, it filters out weak or unsubstantiated claims, and it helps to overcome individual bias and error. It should be noted that consensus is not to be used as dogma. Scientific consensus sometimes evolves or shifts as compelling new evidence emerges that challenges existing understanding. Science, as it is intended to be, is self-correcting. 


However, overturning consensus requires extraordinary evidence that addresses the anomalies and explains the existing evidence as well or better than the previous consensus. In other words, while it is possible, and even sometimes reasonable, to question a consensus, it is not reasonable (
especially for lay people) to favor a non-consensus perspective unless it meets those conditions.


One other important thing to note is that consensus
does not imply 100% unanimity among experts. There are still some individual researchers who dissent from the consensus view, and sometimes for good reasons. However, consensus implies that these dissenting views are held by a small minority and are generally not supported by the bulk of the evidence as interpreted by the wider community of experts. 


To put this in practical terms, it’s not hard to find dissenting experts of a variety of perspectives on a single or similar topic. These viewpoints are often inconsistent, or at least in logical tension, with each other. Let’s say there are three researchers: Dr. Jones, Dr. Smith, and Dr. Anderson. Dr. Jones represents the consensus view A for a specific issue while Dr. Smith represents dissenting view B and Dr. Anderson represents dissenting view C for the same issue. A, B, and C are mutually exclusive.


Determining which one is most reasonable to agree with relies on careful consideration of context. Let’s suppose that you lack expertise in this issue. You’re aware of consensus view A and dissenting views B and C. Given that you are unaware of the body of research as a whole as well as its historical context, it becomes clear that the most reasonable option is A. It’s true that it is possible that either B or C are correct, but you lack the means to support choosing either one over A beyond intuition, personal preference, or other subjective factors. What’s worse, if you gave greater weight to such subjective factors, it would seem then that the choice between B or C is arbitrary. You wouldn’t make arbitrary decisions for your health. After all, you’re reasonable, right?


In conclusion, navigating the vast and often misleading landscape of fitness and nutrition information requires a discerning approach rooted in scientific principles. By understanding what constitutes science-based evidence – including its origins in systematic research, the rigor of peer review, the value of reproducibility, and the strength of scientific consensus – individuals can better differentiate reliable guidance from unsubstantiated claims. While scientific understanding is not immutable and can evolve with new evidence, favoring well-established consensus over isolated dissenting opinions, especially without the expertise to critically evaluate the underlying research, offers the most rational path toward making informed and effective decisions about one's health and well-being.


Here are the key takeaways:



  • There is a lot of information about fitness and nutrition available, but much of it is misinformation.
  • It's difficult to distinguish between accurate and inaccurate information.
  • Science-based information exists but isn't always easily accessible.
  • Science-based information comes from, is supported by, or is consistent with scientific research.
  • It relies on observable, testable, and measurable evidence, not just opinions or anecdotes.
  • Ideally, science-based information is peer-reviewed by independent experts.
  • Reproducibility of research findings is important to reduce bias.
  • Scientific consensus, supported by multiple studies, is valuable and generally more reliable than single studies, especially in fields like exercise and nutrition where studies can be underpowered.
  • Meta-analyses and systematic reviews help overcome the limitations of individual underpowered studies.
  • Scientific consensus indicates high confidence and reliability, helps filter out weak claims, and reduces bias.
  • While scientific consensus can change with strong new evidence, overturning it requires substantial support.
  • Dissenting opinions from the consensus exist, but they are usually held by a minority of experts and not supported by the bulk of evidence.
  • For non-experts, it is generally most reasonable to trust the scientific consensus over individual dissenting views, as choosing otherwise often relies on subjective factors.



A person is holding a donut and an apple in their hands.
By Charlotte Lake July 28, 2025
Explore the complexities of weight management beyond simplistic "calories in, calories out." This article challenges common myths, explaining how biological, psychological, and social factors influence energy balance, and why discipline isn't the sole determinant of success.
A man is sitting on a couch reading a book and using a laptop.
By Charlotte Lake July 23, 2025
Train smarter, not harder! This guide explains how RPE (Perceived Exertion) and RIR (Reps in Reserve) provide an intuitive approach to optimize your strength training for better gains.
A woman is sitting on a yoga mat eating food.
By Charlotte Lake July 16, 2025
Tired of fitness myths? Empower yourself to become a savvy consumer of health information! Discover the scientific method, different types of studies, and how to identify credible evidence to reach your goals.
A woman is swimming in a swimming pool.
By Charlotte Lake June 25, 2025
Explore the power of mindfulness, meditation, and breathwork to enhance athletic performance and recovery. Learn about heart rate variability (HRV) and how these practices can improve your training, with insights on lifting and swimming.
A man is teaching a woman how to use a suspension trainer in a gym.
By Charlotte Lake June 16, 2025
Unlock your full potential with a coaching approach that puts you at the center! Tired of generic fitness plans? This post delves into the power of a client-centered and holistic philosophy, prioritizing your unique needs, goals, and life experiences beyond mere numbers. Discover how personalized training programs, built through collaborative goal setting, address your physical, mental, and emotional well-being for sustainable progress. Learn about the emphasis on empowerment through education, fostering trust and understanding in the coach-client relationship to help you take the reins of your health journey and find lasting joy in movement.
A woman is sitting on a pilates machine with her arms outstretched.
By Charlotte Lake June 11, 2025
Unlock a healthier, more functional body with resistance training, exploring options like Pilates and traditional strength training (weightlifting). Discover the differences between these popular methods and learn how they fit into your fitness journey. While Pilates builds core strength, stability, and flexibility using bodyweight or light resistance, strength training with heavier loads is superior for building muscle mass, strength, and power, offering significant advantages for bone health, combating sarcopenia, improving cognitive function, and metabolic health. Understand the benefits of both Pilates versus strength training to make informed choices for your fitness goals.
A bowl of fruit surrounded by muffins and berries on a table.
By Charlotte Lake May 31, 2025
Boost your health and fitness with the power of dietary fiber! This guide breaks down the benefits of soluble and insoluble fiber for digestion, blood sugar control, heart health, weight management, and disease prevention, including colorectal cancer. Learn why fiber is a "superfood," how it supports your gut microbiome, and get practical tips to easily increase your daily intake from whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and legumes to meet the American Heart Association's recommendation of 25-35 grams (most US adults only get 15-17g!). Start your journey to better overall well-being today by understanding and incorporating more fiber into your diet.
A plate of vegetables and rice on a table with a fork.
By Charlotte Lake May 23, 2025
The post argues against long-term, rigid macro tracking for the average person seeking a healthy and sustainable lifestyle. While acknowledging its utility for specific populations with defined aesthetic or performance goals like bodybuilders and athletes, the author details several potential pitfalls. These include the allure of control leading to a restrictive mindset, the risk of developing or exacerbating body dysmorphia and disordered eating patterns, a disconnection from natural hunger and fullness cues, and a negative impact on quality of life through social isolation and food anxiety. The author advocates for a more balanced and intuitive approach, primarily focusing on mindful eating, "gentle nutrition" (applying general nutritional knowledge without strict tracking), and prioritizing whole foods and overall healthy habits, ultimately emphasizing a healthy and enjoyable relationship with eating over obsessive number counting.
A group of people are sitting on the floor holding yoga mats.
By Charlotte Lake May 8, 2025
This blog post from Holistic Training emphasizes that true well-being extends beyond traditional measures of fitness and nutrition to encompass the social determinants of health. It explores how factors like socioeconomic status, neighborhood environment, access to healthy food, and social connections significantly impact our ability to achieve a healthy and fulfilling life. The post highlights the disconnect between generic health advice and the realities faced by many due to systemic barriers, advocating for a holistic approach that considers individual circumstances, encourages creative solutions, and recognizes the vital roles of community, environment, and social support in our overall well-being.
A woman in a swimsuit and goggles is standing in front of a swimming pool.
By Charlotte Lake April 27, 2025
This guide emphasizes that for Masters swimmers, incorporating resistance training (dryland) is a crucial complement to swimming, vital for enhancing performance, preventing injuries, and improving overall well-being with age by addressing muscle loss and bone density decline. Dryland offers numerous benefits, including increased power and speed in the water, improved injury prevention (especially for shoulders), enhanced bone density, better body position and core stability, greater functional strength, and boosted confidence. A well-rounded program should consistently include 2-3 weekly sessions with exercises targeting swimming muscles like squats, deadlifts, rows, presses, and planks, prioritizing proper form, gradual progression, listening to the body, and supporting training with adequate hydration and nutrition. Ultimately, resistance training is presented as a valuable investment that empowers Masters swimmers to swim faster, stay healthier, and enjoy the sport for the long term.